Reflections Of Osho that invites to be Considered (Ii)

We know that Rajneesh Osho was born in India in 1931 after his enlightenment at age 21, completed his academic studies and taught philosophy for several years at the University of Jabalpur. In 1974 he founded the community of Poona, where since then taught seminars and prestigious multidisciplinary training of inner growth. Osho is a contemporary mystic whose life and teachings have influenced millions of people of all ages and conditions. It ranks as one of the most enlightened spiritual masters and most influential of this century. About his own work Osho has said he is helping to create the conditions for the birth of a new type of human being. There are many works, written to provide in its passage through sharing knowledge, wisdom in order to awaken and nourish our spirit towards its growth, evolution. Bequeaths topics such as: Having little is to have as a wife can have the prettiest woman in the world, but if there is love, may be your wife, but not the possess. It will seem as if possessed, you can use it, you take a walk around the city, clubs, everywhere ...

in that sense, she's your property, is a sign of your position, your success, your wealth, but does not possess. Only love can have ... and now the paradox: when you do not have a woman trying to be possessive, but when you have a woman forget the possession, the possession is still important. You have while it is meaningless to possess, which is why love is not possessive ... Not that love is not possessive, but love has a force of possession so great that the question does not arise. Love so totally believes in, love meets the woman so completely, that possession becomes unimportant. The woman is completely free, because love can give freedom. Love possesses through freedom. When you do not have a woman, you are possessive ..., always fearful, always trembling, she can leave any day. Any day ... because it has never been with you, have never been friends. You may have been very close to each other, but have never intimate. Intimacy is not a physical phenomenon, such as being close. Privacy is a very different thing: you can be with someone but not intimate with him, and you can be away from someone and feel a great intimacy.

The intimacy is between two people, the proximity space. When you are afraid, you become possessive. A man who tries to possess his wife knows, or should know, that does not possess. The woman trying to hold your man, do not have it, hence the effort to possess.

(Osho, Tao The Three Treasures Vol II. Chapter, about the futility of Dispute) Love gives complete freedom and absolute love certainly knows that the other is none other but the very extension of oneself; beating myself in the heart of another. There can be no suspicion. Love is a kind of hunger. When there is hunger, satiety appears. If you love a woman can not feel satisfied. People come to me and says he is not sexually satisfied, I wonder if women have to change. And I say, "You can continue to change as a woman, but nothing will happen." By simply changing food, you can not create appetite appetite you feel you have to feel your stomach alive again, alive and hungry. Food is necessary for the stomach body is hunger. Love is necessary for the heart, is the hunger of your being. (Osho, Tao The Three Treasures Vol II. Chapter, about the futility of Dispute) To have little is to possess. Have in abundance is to be confusing. People who have in abundance, and "plenty" I mean to have more than necessary, do not know what to do with.

People are so sleepy, so sleepy, rest does not even know they do not know what to do but have to continue doing whatever. They feel an urgency, a need to do something, so they continue doing this or that and unnecessarily get into trouble. The rich always have problems because they have the means to do what they want. And the means exceed their needs. The needs are very simple: you need food, you need someone to love and be loved for who need a shelter ... small things, but they are simple and few, the desires are infinite. You can easily meet your needs and then feel so utterly happy that your whole being becomes a prayer of gratitude. But the desires exist for millions ... and can not be satisfied. If you have all the media even more than necessary to meet your needs, not looking to satisfy your needs but your desires run after, then you will go astray. Provided you have the means to go astray you will. It happens every day. The famous saying of Lord Acton says: "Power corrupts and corrupts totally." I disagree.

The power can corrupt. Power corrupts because it is corrupt people that want the power. They do not have the means to do evil things, but they ascend to power if they have those means. Then try to satisfy their evil desires, their corrupt desires. No, the power does not corrupt the contrary, those who are corrupt, but who have never had the chance, always crave power. Before coming to power are saints, but once you manage to stop pretending, because his holiness was only to deceive. His real desire was to gain power. Then they take off their masks, then there is your true reality and that is when you say the power has corrupted. No, the power never corrupted. (Osho, Tao The Three Treasures Vol II. Chapter, about the futility of Dispute) How can power corrupt man? How can corrupt a rich man? Already corrupted, but do not have the means to meet your corruption. You've always wanted to go to a prostitute, but because you are poor, where do you go? You do not have much money, and if you did, you'd discovered it would have to cut the budget and your wife would know.

Mullah Nasrudin was a day to his boss saying, 'Please, would you have to climb the salary. The chief said Nasrudin, have you gone crazy? Just two days we doubled the salary ... and now again? There has not been even a week. Nasrudin replied, 'That's true, but my wife heard that rise ... so it was no use. Subírmelo'll have a little more, just for my pennies. (Osho, Tao The Three Treasures Vol II. Chapter, about the futility of Dispute) The sage embraces the One and becomes the model of the world. How wise he manages to embrace the One, one that includes both opposite ends? Do not choose. "Logic" is "choice" logic says: "This is wrong and that is correct" and choose the right thing. Lao Tzu says: "Therefore the sage embraces the One" without choice, without logical distinctions. Choose the One, the All, the whole comprising all opposites. Choose life with death, not life versus death. Choose love with hate, not love as opposed to hate; choose the All and becomes the model of the world.

Not trying to become the model of the world, that arises; happen by itself (Osho, Tao The Three Treasures Vol II. Chapter, about the futility of Dispute) www.entorno-empresarial.com continued ...