Method dogmatic and Comparative Method

On the right there are several methods, among which we cite the dogmatic method comparative method, among others. However, some authors confused, what should motivate its investigation, which will be held in this venue. The comparative method is typical of comparative law, but this úlotimo not limited to this method, but includes other studies, which have been discussed in various locations, as are indeed our publications on this legal discipline discipline ', which should be subject matter more broadly. If a lawyer does not know this it is clear that can have a partial knowledge of the law, which should be avoided. Even in some states that erl books dogmatic method covers the comparative method, which involves a mistake that should be the subject of criticism within the legal doctrine, and in this sense it is clear that if we have little knowledge about a subject can be induced a mistake by wrong books dfunden dogmas. And in any case everything is debatable doctrine, precisely what Manuel Miranda confrme CHANNELS in master classes I went to the National University of San Marcos.

That is, it is clear that such issues should be the subject of study within the doctrine, among other sources of law. If a lawyer knows this issue is evident that there can be misled by erroneous doctrine, that it does not become known in English law as books of authority, which should motivate the relevant studies.

This type of issues should be studied especially in the introduction to law and comparative law, as well as legal doctrine in this order of ideas is clear that it is very important within the law. The legal issues are debatable, but some authors are against this claim, which must be posted on this site to the spread of knowledge of others, and so it is clear that we can discuss. In the dogmatic method repeats what others say, through the right of appointment, while in the comparative method comparisons are made, ie only part of comparative law. The latter is broader than just legal comparatación, for example we talk about receptions, transplants, mergers, harmonization, unification, among many other legal forms of comparative law themselves. To comparative law have devoted a treaty which has the following name "Treaty of Comparative Law," which appears in the post unit law degree from the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, which donated a few weeks ago and I hope please everyone, so I hope you have received by the legal community, through comments which can be positive and negative in this regard is clear that we expect that they are for publication in various venues.

If a lawyer reads this work is of course you can have a basic idea of ​​comparative law, however, the subject of this home are two methods that are the comparative method and the method dogmatic, which have great importance not only in doctrine but also other sources of law, which is the subject of study in various locations. Comparative law is not exactly like the comparative method, but the latter is part of it. Comparative law and the comparative method are subject or matter may be applicable to all legal disciplines, and the same applies in the case of dogmatic method, ie ta information is embodied in the present work, everyone knows, however The more we wrote to disseminate knowledge to undergraduate students of law, not only of Peruvian law but also of foreign law. The dogmatic method is more developed than the comparative method, at least in the Peruvian law, which should be the subject of estudeios and also in the right publications. If you know these issues can be better legal researchers, and in any case the sources of law are more than 20, but do not cover all knowledge, but only a part of it.

That is, human knowledge is broader than legal knowledge, ie the latter part of the first, which is known to all lawyers across the world and in this way is not to say that we know everything, but only part of the law, which increases with the passage of time.